IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boh/wpaper/01_2018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial health assesment from the accounting perspective in the case of agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Kristýna Nývltová

    (Department of Accounting and Finances, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia In České Budějovice)

Abstract

Agriculture is a very specific field. These specifics cannot be entirely covered by accounting legislation Due to this fact, some accounting items or information that are included in the financial statements may be affected and thus can be also the assessing the financial health of an enterprise affected. The main objectives of the paper are to determine problematic accounting areas in agriculture arising both from the specifics of the given field and the legislative solution of some accounting cases and to assess their impact on the financial statements. The analysis of problematic areas is followed by the application, which evaluates the impact of these areas on the values of selected entries recorded in the financial statements. For the analysis, 163 data records of 64 Czech small and medium agricultural companies was available. To achieve this analysis a paired t-test was used, including analysis of normal distribution assumptions. By using pair t-test, differences in accounting solutions of problematic areas, namely investment subsidies, the lease for the tenant, valuation of the land and the old and new accounting solution of changes in stocks were demonstrated. In all analysis, there is statistically significant difference between currently used method and the proposed method of accounting solution of problematic areas. Despite the statistically significant difference, the total difference of the values of the available data is small. The reason can be the testing of small and medium-sized businesses. The aim is to include large companies as well in the following analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristýna Nývltová, 2018. "Financial health assesment from the accounting perspective in the case of agriculture," Economics Working Papers 2018-01, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:boh:wpaper:01_2018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.ef.jcu.cz/RePEc/boh/wpaper/01_2018.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akwasi A. Ampofo & Robert J. Sellani, 2005. "Examining the differences between United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) and International Accounting Standards (IAS): implications for the harmonization of accounting stan," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 219-231, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haruna, Dzugwahi & Apedzan Emmanuel, Kighir, 2018. "Ifrs Adoption And Shareholders' Wealth Of Deposit Money Banks In Nigeria," International Journal of Contemporary Accounting Issues-IJCAI (formerly International Journal of Accounting & Finance IJAF), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), vol. 7(2), pages 16-30, December.
    2. Francis Aboagye‐Otchere & Juliet Agbeibor, 2012. "The International Financial Reporting Standard for Small and Medium‐sized Entities (IFRS for SMES)," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 190-214, October.
    3. Charles McLure Jr., 2005. "The European Commission‘s Proposals for Corporate Tax Harmonization," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 6(01), pages 32-41, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Accounting; Agriculture; Financial health assessment; Accounting legislation; Specifics of business field;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting
    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:wpaper:01_2018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Markéta Matějíčková (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.