Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Funnel plots for institutional comparisons

Contents:

Author Info

  • Rosa Gini

    ()
    (Regional Agency for Public Health of Tuscany)

  • Sylvia Forni

    ()
    (Regional Agency for Public Health of Tuscany)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    We introduce -funnelcompar-, a Stata routine that performs the analysis suggested by David J. Spiegelhalter (Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance, Statistics in Medicine, Volume 24 Issue 8, 1185-1202). The basic idea in funnel plot is to plot performance indicators against a measure of their precision in order to detect outliers. A scatter plot of an indicator level is plotted together with a baseline and control limits, that shrinks as the sample size gets bigger. Our command performs funnel plots for binomial (proportion) poisson (crude and standardized rates) and normal (means) distributed variables. The baseline (and stan- dard errors in case of normal variables) can either be specified by the user (for instance as literature reference) or be estimated from the data as a weighted or non-weighted mean of the data. By default confidence limits are plotted at 2 and 3 standard error, in order to detect alarm and alert signals, as recommended by statistical process control theory. Options have been implemented to mark single institutions, groups of institutions or those institutions lying outside control limits. These plots are increasingly used to report performance indicators at institutional level. Classical league tables imply the existence of ranking between institutions and implicitly support the idea that some of them are worse/better than others. A different approach is possible using statistical process control theory: all institutions are part of a single system and perform at the same level. Observed differences can never be completely eliminated and are explained by chance (common cause variation). If ob- served variation exceed that expected, special-cause variation exists and requires further explanation to identify its cause.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://repec.org/usug2009/Gini-Forni.pdf
    File Function: presentation slides
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Stata Users Group in its series United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2009 with number 10.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 16 Sep 2009
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:boc:usug09:10

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.stata.com/meeting/uk09
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug09:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.