IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/usug05/11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimation of ordinal response models, accounting for sample selection bias

Author

Listed:
  • Alfonso Miranda

    (Keele University)

Abstract

Studying behaviour in economics, sociology, and statistics often involves fitting a model in which the outcome is an ordinal response which is only observed for a subsample of subjects. (For example, questions about health satisfaction in a survey might be asked only of respondents who have a particular health condition.) In this situation, estimation of the ordinal response model without taking account of this "sample selection" effect, using e.g. -ologit- or -oprobit-, may lead to biased parameter estimates. (In the earlier example, unobserved factors that increase the chances of having the health condition may be correlated with the unobserved factors that affect health satisfaction.) The program -gllamm- can be used to estimate ordinal response models accounting for sample selection, by ML. This paper describes a "wrapper" program, -osm-, that calls -gllamm- to fit the model. It accepts data in a simple structure, has a straightforward syntax and, moreover, reports output in a manner that is easily interpretable. One important feature of -osm- is that the log-likelihood can be evaluated using adaptive quadrature.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfonso Miranda, 2005. "Estimation of ordinal response models, accounting for sample selection bias," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2005 11, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:usug05:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/usug2005/miranda-osm.pdf
    File Function: presentation slides
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alfonso Miranda & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2006. "Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching and sample selection models for binary, ordinal, and count variables," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 6(3), pages 285-308, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug05:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.