IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/usug04/17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Applying the Cox proportional hazards regression model to competing risks

Author

Listed:
  • Abdel G. A. Babiker

    (MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London)

  • Mohamed M. Ali

    (RHR/WHO, Geneva)

Abstract

In the presence of dependent competing risks in survival analysis, the Cox proportional hazards model can be utilised to examine covariate effects on the cause-specific hazard function for each type of failure. The method proposed by Lunn and McNeil (1995) requires data augmentation. With k failure types, the data would be duplicated k times, one record for each failure type. Either a stratified or an unstratified analysis could be used, depending on whether the assumption of proportional hazards holds. If the proportional hazards assumption does not hold across the causes, the stratified analysis should be used, which is equivalent to fitting a separate model for each failure type. The unstratified analysis assumes a constant hazard ratio between failure types and this could be fitted by including an indicator variable as a covariate. We will show how both approaches could be fitted on augmented data using stcox. In addition to the parameter estimates and their standard errors, the program has an option to produce cumulative incidence functions with pointwise confidence limits.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdel G. A. Babiker & Mohamed M. Ali, 2004. "Applying the Cox proportional hazards regression model to competing risks," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2004 17, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:usug04:17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug04:17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.