IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/scon12/20.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

TMPM.ado: The Trauma Mortality Prediction Model is Robust to ICD-9 and AIS Coding Lexicons

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Cook

    (Baylor University Medical Center - Dallas, Texas)

  • Turner M. Osler

    (University of Vermont College of Medicine, Department of Surgery)

Abstract

Many methods have been developed to predict mortality following trauma. Two classification systems are used to provide a taxonomy for diseases, including injuries. The ICD-9 is the classification system for administrative data in the U.S.A. AIS was developed for characterization of injuries alone. The Trauma Mortality Prediction Model (TMPM) is based on empiric estimates of severity for each injury in the ICD-9 and AIS lexicons. Each probability of mortality (POD) is estimated from the five worst injuries per patient. TMPM has been rigorously tested against other mortality prediction models using ICD-9 and AIS data and found superior. The TMPM.ado command allows Stata users to efficiently apply TMPM to data sets using ICD-9 or AIS. The command makes use of model-averaged regression coefficients (MARC) that assign empirically derived severity measures for each of the 1,322 AIS codes and 1,579 ICD-9 injury codes. The injury codes are sorted into body regions then merged with the MARC table to assemble a set of regression coefficients. A logit model is generated to calculate the probability of death. TMPM.ado accommodates either AIS or ICD-9 lexicons from a single command and adds the POD for each patient to the original dataset as a new variable.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Cook & Turner M. Osler, 2012. "TMPM.ado: The Trauma Mortality Prediction Model is Robust to ICD-9 and AIS Coding Lexicons," SAN12 Stata Conference 20, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:scon12:20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/san2012/cook.san2012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:scon12:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.