Conditional Stereotype Logistic Regression: A New Estimation Command
AbstractThe stereotype logistic regression model for a categorical dependent variable is often described as a compromise between the multinomial and proportional-odds logistic models, and has many attractive features. Among these are the ability to test the adequacy of the model fit compared to the unconstrained multinomial model, to test the distinguishability of the outcome categories, and even to test the 'ordinality' assumption itself. What brought me to write the new command however, was the desire to take advantage of these capabilities while working on a matched, case-control study. Like the multinomial logistic model (and unlike the proportional-odds model), the stereotype model yields valid inference under outcome dependent sampling designs, and can be much more parsimonious. The working title of my command is -cstereo-, and it is implemented using the d2-method of Stata's -ml- command. In terms of existing Stata capabilities: -clogit- is to -logit- as -cstereo- is to -slogit-. In this talk I will demonstrate the command's features using a simulated matched, case-control dataset.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Stata Users Group in its series 2013 Stata Conference with number 11.
Date of creation: 01 Aug 2013
Date of revision:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2013-08-05 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.