Pitfalls in the analysis of complex surveys using Stata
AbstractThe purpose of this presentation is to show the common mistakes in the analysis of complex surveys. In Mexico, we have a significant number of complex surveys available, which cover (among other issues) household income and expenditures, the labor market, consumer confidence, public security perception, and family life. The heart of the matter is the following: if you ignore the sampling design of a complex survey (basically, the probability weights, the clustering, and the stratification), inevitably you will get an erroneous estimation of whatever you are dealing with. Stata is a fully survey-capable software that takes into account the sampling design. I explore Stata’s survey methods capabilities and, as far as I know, illustrate the best practices in the analysis of complex surveys for the following topics: descriptive statistics, variance estimation methods, hypothesis testing, and econometric models.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Stata Users Group in its series Mexican Stata Users' Group Meetings 2011 with number 06.
Date of creation: 23 Jul 2011
Date of revision:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2011-08-02 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.