IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/lsug23/02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multiply imputing informatively censored time-to-event data

Author

Listed:
  • Ian R White

    (MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK)

  • Patrick Royston

Abstract

Time-to-event data, such as overall survival in a cancer clinical trial, are commonly right-censored, and this censoring is commonly assumed to be non-informative. While non-informative censoring is plausible when censoring is due to end of study, it is less plausible when censoring is due to loss to follow-up. Sensitivity analyses for departures from the non-informative censoring assumption can be performed using multiple imputation under the Cox model [1]. These have been implemented in R [2] but are not commonly used. We propose a new implementation in Stata. Our existing -stsurvimpute- command (on SSC) imputes right-censored data under non-informative censoring, using a flexible parametric survival model fitted by -stpm2-. We extend this to allow a sensitivity parameter gamma, representing the log of the hazard ratio in censored individuals versus comparable uncensored individuals (the informative censoring hazard ratio, ICHR). The sensitivity parameter can vary between individuals, and imputed data can be re-censored at the end-of-study time. Because the -mi- suite does not allow imputed variables to be -stset-, we create an imputed data set in -ice- format and analyse it using -mim-. In practice, sensitivity analysis computes the treatment effect for a range of scientifically plausible values of gamma. We illustrate the approach using a cancer clinical trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian R White & Patrick Royston, 2023. "Multiply imputing informatively censored time-to-event data," UK Stata Conference 2023 02, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:lsug23:02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/lsug2023/Stata_UK23_White.pptx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:lsug23:02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.