IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bls/wpaper/539.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Alternative Capital Asset Depreciation Rates for U.S. Capital and Multifactor Productivity Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Michael D. Giandrea
  • Robert J. Kornfeld
  • Peter B. Meyer
  • Susan G. Powers

Abstract

The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) use estimates of depreciation rates for structures and equipment to construct estimates of capital stock from data on capital investments. The depreciation rates are based mainly on research by Hulten and Wykoff from the early 1980s, and may be out of date. Recent studies by Statistics Canada (2007 and 2015), using Canadian data on used asset transactions from Canada’s Annual Capital Expenditures and Repair Survey (CAPEX) of establishments, found relatively faster depreciation rates, especially for structures. A study by Bokhari and Geltner (2019) used U.S. data on used asset prices and also found faster depreciation rates for structures. To illustrate the potential effects of implementing these estimates from newer studies, we created a concordance to match Canadian to U.S. asset categories, and then re-estimated BEA capital stock measures and the BLS capital and multifactor productivity measures using depreciation rates based on the CAPEX survey. We find that using these faster depreciation rates results in substantially lower estimates of net capital stocks and higher estimates of depreciation in BEA’s accounts, and has minimal effects on growth rates of multifactor productivity (MFP) in the BLS accounts.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael D. Giandrea & Robert J. Kornfeld & Peter B. Meyer & Susan G. Powers, 2021. "Alternative Capital Asset Depreciation Rates for U.S. Capital and Multifactor Productivity Measures," Economic Working Papers 539, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bls:wpaper:539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2021/pdf/ec210050.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bls:wpaper:539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jennifer Cassidy-Gilbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/blsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.