IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bls/wpaper/519.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Subjective Equivalence Scales and Income Poverty in Eastern vs Western European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Mysíková
  • Tomáš Želinský
  • Thesia I. Garner
  • Kamila Fialová

Abstract

This study uses the intersection approach to estimate Subjective Poverty Lines and implicit subjective equivalence scales for European countries. The subjective poverty lines are derived from the Minimum Income Question included in the 2017 EU–Statistics on Income and Living Conditions data. Subjective equivalence scales differ across the European region, showing lower economies of scale for Eastern European countries. When the estimated subjective equivalence scales are applied to derive the official at-risk-of-poverty (AROP) rather than the OECD-modified scale, the ranking of countries changes only moderately. However, subjective poverty (SP) rates based on the derived subjective lines change the ranking of European countries markedly. SP rates show a much clearer pattern of the East-West division of Europe. The results suggest that country-specific economies of scale should be considered in studies of economic well-being, particularly those focused on income poverty

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Mysíková & Tomáš Želinský & Thesia I. Garner & Kamila Fialová, 2019. "Subjective Equivalence Scales and Income Poverty in Eastern vs Western European Countries," Economic Working Papers 519, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bls:wpaper:519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2019/pdf/ec190090.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bls:wpaper:519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jennifer Cassidy-Gilbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/blsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.