IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bls/wpaper/505.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Imported Inputs to U.S. Production and Productivity: Two decades of Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy P. Eldridge
  • Susan G. Powers

Abstract

Imports have increased in importance in U.S. production over the past 2 decades. From 1997-2015 imports have grown from 8 to 10 percent of all intermediate inputs - materials, services and energy - used by U.S. firms to produce goods and services. The substitution of imported inputs for domestically produced intermediate inputs or U.S. labor– known as offshoring or offshoring outsourcing – has raised questions about the impact of imported inputs on US labor productivity and economic performance. The June 2010 Monthly Labor Review article “Effects of imported intermediate inputs on productivity,“ by Lucy P. Eldridge and Michael J. Harper developed a framework for estimating the effects of imported intermediate inputs on U.S. labor productivity. In that study, the production model used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to calculate multifactor productivity measures was expanded to treat imported intermediate inputs as an input to production in the U.S. private business sector, rather than as a subtraction from output.1 This model allows the analysis of offshoring. In addition, the Eldridge-Harper study isolated imported inputs used by the manufacturing sector to assess their impact on productivity. This article updates the earlier estimates for 1997-2006, extending the analysis through 2015 and showing that imports continue to be an important contributor to U.S. production.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy P. Eldridge & Susan G. Powers, 2018. "Imported Inputs to U.S. Production and Productivity: Two decades of Evidence," Economic Working Papers 505, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bls:wpaper:505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2018/pdf/ec180050.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bls:wpaper:505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jennifer Cassidy-Gilbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/blsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.