This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Survival Point Estimate Prediction in Cohorts with Nested Case-Control Study Designs

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Annette Molinaro (Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley)
Mark van der Laan (Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley)
Dan Moore (Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco)
Karla Kerlikowske (Dept. of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco)
Abstract

Providing information about the risk of disease and clinical factors that may increase or decrease a patient's risk of disease is standard medical practice. Although case-control studies provide evidence of strong associations between diseases and risk factors, clinicians need to be able to communicate to patients the age-specific risk of disease for a given time period and risk factor. An estimate of absolute risk cannot be determined from case-control studies because cases are generally chosen from a population whose denominator is not known (necessary for calculation of risk) and where duration of follow-up is not known (necessary for calculation of incidence). This problem can sometimes be overcome by using a nested case-control design.A nested case-control study is "nested" within a cohort study such that both cases and controls are selected from within a defined cohort. A nested case-control design is more cost-efficient than a full cohort study since expensive predictor variables (genomic measures, sex hormone levels, mammographic breast density) are measured on all of the cases, but on only a sample of the cohort who did not develop the outcome of interest (the controls). In addition, this design avoids the potential biases of conventional case-control studies that draw cases and controls from different populations. Importantly, the presence or absence of the outcome of interest has been established for the entire cohort within the same time period.Here we introduce a novel method which provides locally efficient estimators which predict the absolute risk of a cohort from measures only taken on the nested case-control participants. The proposed method is evaluated using simulation studies and survival data from women with ductal carcinoma in situ, a non-invasive form of breast cancer.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1149&context=ucbbiostat
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Berkeley Electronic Press in its series U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series with number 1149.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 11 Jul 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:bep:ucbbio:1149

Note: oai:bepress.com:ucbbiostat-1149
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.bepress.com

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: Nested Case-Control; Absolute Risk; Survival analysis; Cohort studies; Risk set sampling; Prediction;

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Apart from a small start up grant in the 1990's, RePEc has received no funding and lives on the help of volunteers.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-15.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.