This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The false discovery rate: a variable selection perspective

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Debashis Ghosh (University of Michigan)
Wei Chen (University of Michigan Biostatistics)
Trivellore Raghuanthan (University of Michigan)
Abstract

In many scientific and medical settings, large-scale experiments are generating large quantities of data that lead to inferential problems involving multiple hypotheses. This has led to recent tremendous interest in statistical methods regarding the false discovery rate (FDR). Several authors have studied the properties involving FDR in a univariate mixture model setting. In this article, we turn the problem on its side; in this manuscript, we show that FDR is a by-product of Bayesian analysis of variable selection problem for a hierarchical linear regression model. This equivalence gives many Bayesian insights as to why FDR is a natural quantity to consider. In addition, we relate the risk properties of FDR-controlling procedures to those from variable selection procedures from a decision theoretic framework different from that considered by other authors.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=umichbiostat
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Berkeley Electronic Press in its series The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series with number 1040.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 11 Jul 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:bep:mchbio:1040

Note: oai:bepress.com:umichbiostat-1040
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.bepress.com

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: gene expression; hypothesis testing; model selection; multiple comparisons; risk; simultaneous inference;

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Christopher Genovese & Larry Wasserman, 2002. "Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure," Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 499-517. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Efron B. & Tibshirani R. & Storey J.D. & Tusher V., 2001. "Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1151-1160, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Smith, Michael & Kohn, Robert, 1996. "Nonparametric regression using Bayesian variable selection," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 317-343, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. John D. Storey, 2002. "A direct approach to false discovery rates," Journal Of The Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 479-498. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also computes impact factors for journals and working paper series.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-19.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.