IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdc/wpaper/418.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

WTO Reform - Improving Transparency and Notifications in the WTO

Author

Listed:
  • Anwarul Hoda

    (Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER))

Abstract

Some initiatives in the ongoing debate on improving transparency and notifications as a part of talks on WTO reform seem to have been based on the false belief that compliance with notification requirements could be induced through threat of punitive action. Arguments made during discussions on the issue seem to have convinced the WTO membership that defaults in meeting the deadlines for notifications arise less from wilful neglect and more from the challenging complexity of the format of notifications and lack of capacity and paucity of resources in many developing countries. Even so, the assessment made by the author is that the compliance performance of the top 50 or so trading nations is reasonably satisfactory. It is mainly the LDCs, island developing countries and other developing countries with limited administrative infrastructure that have fallen short. The solution lies in simplifying the formats for the benefit of all members and lowering the bar on frequency of notifications for LDC members and other members with small economies and limited administrative infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Anwarul Hoda, 2023. "WTO Reform - Improving Transparency and Notifications in the WTO," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 418, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdc:wpaper:418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://icrier.org/pdf/Working_Paper_418.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    WTO reform; monitoring; surveillance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdc:wpaper:418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chhaya Singh (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.icrier.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.