IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdc/wpaper/410.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Safeguarding against Corruption during the Pandemic: Recent Evidence from the G20 Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Tanu M Goyal

    (Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER))

Abstract

The paper found that to address the Covid-19-situation, most G20 countries announced a mix of budget and off-budget items as stimulus packages. Almost all G20 countries reported corruption risks, the most common being corruption and fraud risks in public procurement of medicines, medical supplies or any related goods or services. At the same time, the G20 undertook accountability assessment for its members and the G20 countries formulated mechanisms to address corruption risks, frequenting the use of technology and by enhancing the role of civil society.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanu M Goyal, 2022. "Safeguarding against Corruption during the Pandemic: Recent Evidence from the G20 Countries," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 410, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdc:wpaper:410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://icrier.org/pdf/Working_Paper_410.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Covid-19; fiscal expansion; corruption; global governance; G20;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdc:wpaper:410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chhaya Singh (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.icrier.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.