Investment and Growth: Half a Century of a Subtle and Frequently Misunderstood Relationship
AbstractA usual policy recommendation to promote sustained economic growth it to dedicate increasing resources to the investment process (i.e. high investment rates). In contrast, a well known result of neoclassical growth theory is that the only determinant of long run growth is technological progress, not capital accumulation. On the contrary, to postulate that the investment rate has an important role to play in long run growth one needs to assume, as the new theory of growth does, that investment is capable of generating increases in aggregate productivity through externalities or some other form of increasing returns to scale. However, this qualifications are not the ones that are usually invoked when it is claimed that investment is the key ingredient for long run growth, as it is usually asserted in policy debates. It is not the purpose of this paper to deny the existence of the investment growth nexus. In fact, this paper argues that in the case of our economies, because of their important contribution on macroeconomic sustainability, high investment and domestic savings rates can play a crucial role in the consolidation of the growth process. Moreover, although it is not the case of Argentina (as we illustrate quantitatively), this paper also aims to recall that potential intergenerational sub optimal situations of dynamic inefficiency can arise if the investment rate exceeds its optimal level.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Central Bank of Argentina, Economic Research Department in its series BCRA Working Paper Series with number 200722.
Length: 34 pages
Date of creation: Sep 2007
Date of revision:
economic growth; investment rate; productivity; domestic savings;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- D9 - Microeconomics - - Intertemporal Choice
- E2 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment
- O3 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights
- O4 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Peter Klenow & Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, 1997. "The Neoclassical Revival in Growth Economics: Has It Gone Too Far?," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997, Volume 12, pages 73-114 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Douglas Gollin, 2002.
"Getting Income Shares Right,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(2), pages 458-474, April.
- Gregory Mankiw, 1995.
"The Growth of Nations,"
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,
Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 26(1, 25th A), pages 275-326.
- N. Gregory Mankiw, 1995. "The Growth of Nations," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1732, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
- Ricardo Bebczuk & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel, 2006.
"The Feldstein-Horioka Paradox: A New Perspective from the Institutional Sector Level,"
BCRA Working Paper Series
200603, Central Bank of Argentina, Economic Research Department.
- Ricardo Bebczuk & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel, 2007. "The Feldstein-Horioka Paradox: A New Perspective from the Institutional Sector Level," Ensayos Económicos, Central Bank of Argentina, Economic Research Department, vol. 1(46), pages 103-136, January -.
- Rómulo A. Chumacero & J. Rodrigo Fuentes, 2002. "On the determinants of the Chilean Economic Growth," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 134, Central Bank of Chile.
- Paul M. Romer, 1987. "Crazy Explanations for the Productivity Slowdown," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1987, Volume 2, pages 163-210 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Ricardo Bebczuk & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel, 2007. "La paradoja de Feldstein-Horioka: una nueva visión a nivel de sectores institucionales," Monetaria, Centro de Estudios Monetarios Latinoamericanos, vol. 0(1), pages 49-82, enero-mar.
- Barry P. Bosworth & Susan M. Collins, 2003. "The Empirics of Growth: An Update," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 34(2), pages 113-206.
- Young, Alwyn, 1995. "The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 110(3), pages 641-80, August.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Federico Grillo).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.