IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bca/bocsan/18-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Characteristics of Uninsured Mortgages and their Securitization Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Adi Mordel
  • Maria teNyenhuis

Abstract

Following changes to housing finance policies that target insured mortgages, uninsured mortgage credit has been growing. This robust growth creates a larger pool of mortgages that may be suitable for private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). The development and viability of the Canadian private-label RMBS market would depend on the characteristics of the underlying collateral. We address this data gap by documenting the key features of uninsured mortgages originated since 2014, comparing them across two groups of federally regulated financial institutions, i.e., domestic systemically important banks (DSIBs) and non-DSIBs. We find that on average, non-DSIB mortgages exhibit riskier characteristics, including lower credit scores, and higher debt-service and loan-to-income ratios. When compared with the prime quality collateral backing domestically issued RMBS to date, we estimate that the non-DSIBs’ securitization potential since 2014 has been about $17 billion. Growing that issuance further would require approaches to broaden the pool of acceptable mortgages.

Suggested Citation

  • Adi Mordel & Maria teNyenhuis, 2018. "The Characteristics of Uninsured Mortgages and their Securitization Potential," Staff Analytical Notes 2018-24, Bank of Canada.
  • Handle: RePEc:bca:bocsan:18-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/san2018-24.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Clark & Shaoteng Li, 2022. "The Strategic Response of Banks to Macroprudential Policies: Evidence from Mortgage Stress Tests in Canada [LIBOR manipulation?]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(1), pages 187-216.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Institutions; Financial system regulation and policies; Wholesale funding;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G - Financial Economics
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bca:bocsan:18-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bocgvca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.