This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

In Search of an Optimal Revaluation Policy: Benefits and Pitfalls

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Alan S. Dornfest
Abstract

It is well established that revaluation and the use of current market value in principle as the underpinning for the property tax base will improve the equitable distribution of the property tax between taxpayers. Because the market place is dynamic and ever-changing, and the property tax is an annually recurring tax, it is necessary to establish an ongoing system of periodic revaluation to ensure that the relationships established in an initial appraisal are still accurate. All of this is justifiable from the standpoint of maximizing equity, assuming that equity is defined in terms of maintaining an accurate relationship between the tax and the market value of the underlying property. However, both initial establishment of appraised values and subsequent reappraisal are costly, time consuming endeavors. Depending on the type of property, the extent of the revaluation, and available resources, costs may vary from as little as a few dollars to more than $80 per parcel. In addition, taxpayers often fear that some aspect of tax amount stability and predictability that may have occurred without reappraisal may be lost with it. Also, depending on the underlying taxation system, taxpayers fear that reappraisal means higher taxable values and higher taxes. These factors have lead to a hodge podge of tax and reappraisal policies across the United States. In this paper, we will explore the connections between costs, equity, and taxpayer concerns regarding revaluation and the worsening prospects for successfully reconciling all of these issues in cases where revaluation has been infrequent. We will also attempt to outline features that should be contained within a model policy.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/files/ispwp0817.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University in its series International Studies Program Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU with number paper0817.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 46 pages
Date of creation: 01 Dec 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper0817

Contact details of provider:
Phone: 404-413-0235
Fax: 404-413-0244
Web page: http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/index.html
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Paul Benson).

Related research
Keywords: property tax; Revaluation Policy; reappraisal policies;

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Cannot find something on IDEAS? Encourage the publisher to index it! Instructions.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-18.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.