The Inadequacy of Friedman and Savage’s Critique of Diminishing Marginal Utility
AbstractIn a well-known paper Friedman and Savage (1948) advocated a utility function in which the marginal utility of wealth is increasing in wealth above some critical level of wealth. In order to win a reception for this novel conception of the utility function Friedman and Savage took some pains in the first part of their paper to try to shake the grip that the 'law of diminishing marginal utility ' had on the mind of their fellow economists. To that end they criticised a classic 'elemental argument' in favour marginal utility being diminishing in wealth. Friedman and Savage's attempt to reconcile the rich man's avoidance of pain with increasing marginal utility is inadequate. We find that the 'elemental argument' that concludes in favour of diminishing marginal utility - on the basis of a comparison of rich and poor - is valid.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number 676.
Date of creation: Nov 2012
Date of revision:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-12-06 (All new papers)
- NEP-HPE-2012-12-06 (History & Philosophy of Economics)
- NEP-UPT-2012-12-06 (Utility Models & Prospect Theory)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.