IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/auc/wpaper/179.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade Liberalisation and Factor Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Kao, Tina

Abstract

This paper analyses the effects of New Zealand's trade liberalisation on its factor markets. Although the consensus among most existing empirical studies is that there is little contribution of trade in increasing wage inequality, disagreement remains regarding the appropriate methodology. Recognising the importance of taking account of general equihbrium considerations, this paper follows the factor content of trade formulation proposed by Deardorff and Staiger (1988) and Deardorff and Lattimore (1999a, b). It is found that, in contrast to the income distribution widening effect, Ncw Zealand's trade reforms have reduced skill premiums when the comparison is made between 1986 and 1996. This result is consistent with Deardorff and Lattimore (1999a, b). Furthermore Data of personal income distribution by qualifications are investigated. From 1986 to 1996, a tendency of income dstribution widening is found. If the relative factor returns and personal income distribution by qualifications are hlghly correlated, it suggests that trade liberatisation has helped reduce income inequality while somc other factors have led to the widening of the income distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Kao, Tina, 2000. "Trade Liberalisation and Factor Returns," Working Papers 179, Department of Economics, The University of Auckland.
  • Handle: RePEc:auc:wpaper:179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2292/179
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:auc:wpaper:179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library Digital Development (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deaucnz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.