IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2023_63.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Signal herding and contrarianism in REITs – stock vs fixed income factors

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Liu
  • Yuanyuan Zhao

Abstract

Herding and contrarian (reverse herding) behaviours have received considerable attention in finance studies. The former generally refers to market participants’ behaviour of mimicking the action of others while suppressing their own private information; while agents are seen as contrarians if they ignore their private information about value uncertainty and trade against the trend in the market. Both behaviours can cause price distortion and hence potentially exacerbate the volatility of the financial market. One approach to detect herding (contrarianism) is to see if return dispersions, usually measured by the cross-sectional absolute deviation of returns (CSDA), decrease (increase) non-linearly if the overall market return increase as investors converge towards (against) market consensus. Using this approach, this study focuses on investors’ behaviours in the US equity Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) market. While both herding and contrarianism are evident in the existing empirical studies in REITs, the explanations for such behaviours are anecdotal. This paper aims to further examine the factors that amplify or reduce such behaviours. We put forward two novel empirical strategies: first, we decompose dispersions in returns due to fundamental stock market factors (i.e., Fama-French factors) and fixed income assets factors. This strategy reflects on the argument that equity REITs have the characteristics of small stock as well those of fixed income assets including direct real estate and bond. Second, we define volatility signals derived from US stock market, treasuries yield (3-month and 10-year), and sentiment measure (CBOE VIX) and investigate such signals induce investors to converge towards or depart from market consensus. Our results are threefold. Firstly, using survivorship-bias free CRSP Ziman REITS daily data for equity REITs from January 1980 to December 2021, our static CSAD models show strong evidence of contrarianism for the whole equity REITs market as well as in all sub-sectors (including Diversified, Healthcare, Industrial/Office, Residential, Retail, and Self-storage) except lodging. Using rolling window specifications, our results show short periods of herding in the 80s and 90s when the industry was relatively new and in 2020 at the beginning of the Covid pandemic, but contrarianism is evident throughout the time period. Once CSAD is dissected into stock and fixed-income elements, neither herding nor contrarianism is evident in stock elements, however volatility signals from VIX and short-term T-bill induce investors to converge towards market consensus, whereas signals from the stock market induce departure from market consensus. In the fixed-income proportion of CSAD, contrarianism is strongly evident, but signals from the stock market reduces such behaviours. Our results imply that investors in the REITs market predominately trade against the market, this could be that they place more emphasis on the market fundamentals related to direct real estate and bonds. Such contrarianism behaviour however, is dampened by informative volatility signals from the macro-economic factors as well as market sentiment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Liu & Yuanyuan Zhao, 2023. "Signal herding and contrarianism in REITs – stock vs fixed income factors," ERES eres2023_63, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2023-63
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Contrarianism; Herding; REITs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2023_63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.