IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2021_152.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Let´s Talk – Open Dialogue between Property Developers and Municipalities Facilitating Sustainable Urban Development - Analysis of Perspectives, Working Methods and Communication Needs

Author

Listed:
  • Ann-Christin Sreball

Abstract

Stereotypes of the „dull municipality“ vs. the „cash-hungry developer“ persist and hamper the collaboration – especially if municipal administrations tend to focus on problems rather than solutions or if developers disregard local specifics and focus solely on their return expectations. Yet, it seems municipalities and developers repositioning themselves in Germany: While municipal administrations digitize and keep design processes in-house again, developers shift their focus from specific asset classes to development of entire neighbourhoods. Moreover, planning tasks to design sustainable projects are becoming increasingly complex requiring more coordination between both parties. Therefore, understanding the perspectives and needs of both stakeholders will promote a more constructive collaboration. A qualitative study with more than 30 experts from planning agencies, councillors, project development companies, services providers and organisations, revealed 3 types of factors shaping the project collaboration: Unique soft, unique hard and generalising factors, with unique referring to factors applicable to one specific person or project context only. Some examples for “unique hard factors” are urban planning framework conditions or local real estate market structures, and “unique soft factors” such as local decision-making structures, the professional background or past experiences of the persons involved as well as the matter of mutual trust. Generalising factors can be grouped into promoting and impeding, such as frequent and transparent communication or vague objectives of urban planning. One of the areas of tension lies, e.g., in the detail level of information. If the developer approaches the administration with already made concepts and the final floor plan, the necessary room to jointly develop the project is lacking from the very beginning. Municipalities admit that they need to articulate their urban development objectives more clearly to provide developers with the appropriate framework conditions for the project. The conference contribution will highlight more findings of the interviews in detail. Drawn conclusions and recommended actions will be put up for discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann-Christin Sreball, 2021. "Let´s Talk – Open Dialogue between Property Developers and Municipalities Facilitating Sustainable Urban Development - Analysis of Perspectives, Working Methods and Communication Needs," ERES eres2021_152, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2021_152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2021-152
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Collaboration; Communication; Sustainable Urban Development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2021_152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.