IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2019_221.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Co-working spaces impact on CBD office spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Abukar Warsame
  • Sviatlana Engerstam

Abstract

The level of rents and property values play a major role in defining different types of urban structures. A central business district (CBD) is often associated with high rents and high property values and subsequently tall buildings are constructed in order to offset high land prices. The expansion of co-working space market seems to have impact on the traditional office markets that were mostly located in CBDs. An increase of co-working spaces and their locations might lead to less concentration of traditional office spaces in central locations and thus transformation of urban structures is expected. Most of the studies in the co-working spaces focus on productivity of users and flexibility of the shared working space but not on the long term consequence of dynamic impact of co-working spaces on the existing urban structure. The aim of this paper is to explore the transformation of urban structures triggered by the spread of co-working space in the Stockholm region. This study is mainly descriptive based on the data of recent development of co-working spaces and their locations. We will also complement our analysis with a case study and interviews of major actors in the office markets. We expect the rents and property values of existing locations will be affected by the concentration of co-working spaces in new urban areas. Subsequently, more segmented office markets with lower density can be expected to emerge in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Abukar Warsame & Sviatlana Engerstam, 2019. "Co-working spaces impact on CBD office spaces," ERES eres2019_221, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2019_221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2019-221
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Central business district; co-working; Office Markets; Urban Structure;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2019_221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.