IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2018_276.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Professional Manager instead of Managing Professional – Value and design of a new Bauhaus degree program

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Gaede
  • Annette Kaempf-Dern

Abstract

Purpose: In times of growing complexity, the reasons for failure of built environments’ projects are diverse. A central but widely ignored issue is the insufficient qualification of staff members regardless of rank and discipline. The focus is on producing specialists while neglecting the development of generalists that are able to handle broad and increasingly linked knowledge areas as well as to communicate, to connect, and to cooperate. Starting with requirements analysis and surveying existing degree/course options, the status quo needs to be challenged, considering a fundamentally new approach to higher education in the built environments areas like architecture or civil engineering. By reference to the renowned medical education system and the historic Bauhaus, such an approach has now been developed and its application, named ‘New Bauhaus Degree Program”, is described in this paper.Design: Firstly, preexistent research discussing the industry’s HR needs and the need for generalists in addition to specialists has been evaluated and compared with the current degree offers in Germany accredited by the gif. For this, multi-dimensional clusters have been formed. Secondly, the system of medical education and the “Bauhaus Studium” by W. Gropius have been comprehensively characterized. All preceding findings have then been consolidated to a framework allowing both specialist and management education to emerge from one multidisciplinary entry path. This framework then served as the basis for the development of an idea for the ‘New Bauhaus Program Degree’.Findings: The evaluation of preexistent research reveals that despite all graduates needing specific aspects of technical knowledge and (inter)personal skills, career paths should clearly differentiate between Specialist and Manager after broad basic training introducing the world of built environments. The study furthermore shows that both, personality formation and interdisciplinary training, are significantly underrepresented in most existing programs. The medical system with 6 years of basic training before specialization and a similar approach by Gropius suggest that multidisciplinary interfaculty training should be the basis for all students. Using these insights for the design of a new integrative program resulted in a framework consisting of a 2-year module of Pre-Specialization and a 2-year module of Specialization with one specialization being Professional Management of Built Environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Gaede & Annette Kaempf-Dern, 2018. "Professional Manager instead of Managing Professional – Value and design of a new Bauhaus degree program," ERES eres2018_276, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2018_276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2018-276
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bauhaus; Generalist versus Specialist; Multidisciplinary Approach; Professional Management; Real Estate Education;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2018_276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.