IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2017_49.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unprofitable tenants: the usual suspects? A case study of modelling tenant profitability

Author

Listed:
  • Bernd Kolkmann
  • Ingrid Janssen

Abstract

Studies have shown that certain tenants are frequently excluded from the housing market given landlords’ measurement of financial eligibility using opaque risk management approaches. What is arguably needed is a scientific model that would allow landlords to build their decision on the dependent variable they are most interested in; that is, customer profit. This would follow in the footsteps of other industries that commonly use customer profitability analysis, such as hotels, financial services, and the private health care sector. Using the case study of the German housing market, this study will construct such a model that landlords can use to evaluate tenant profitability. Using a methodology based on customer profitability analysis, the research will deconstruct the key variables that make tenants financially profitable in the eyes of a residential landlord, and demonstrate their interaction. This paper argues why and how a profitability approach adds value for the landlord and explains the model based on an extensive literature review.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernd Kolkmann & Ingrid Janssen, 2017. "Unprofitable tenants: the usual suspects? A case study of modelling tenant profitability," ERES eres2017_49, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2017_49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2017-49
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Customer profitability analysis; Housing; Tenant profitability; Tenant risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2017_49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.