IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2016_52.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is there a business case for green office buildings?: Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Lynne Armitage
  • Lyndon Tam
  • James Cox

Abstract

Whilst buildings are considered one of the largest contributors to climate change, they also offer major potential for greenhouse gas abatement (Levine et al., 2007). Climate Works Australia (2010) estimates that the built environment has the potential to contribute 11% of Australia’s 2020 least cost emissions reductions and that 77% of these emissions reduction opportunities will come from within the commercial sector. It has also calculated that the majority of these emissions reductions are net present value (NPV) positive to investors, even without a carbon price. Eichholtz et al. (2010) suggest that energy represents 30% of operating expenses in a typical office building, and is the single largest and most manageable operating expense in the provision of office space. Consequently, the built environment and the industry players that create, occupy and manage it have a vital role to play in limiting the detrimental effects of climate change and delivering a sustainable outcome in the future. This responsibility lies not only with developers and builders of green buildings, but also other important stakeholders such as investors, owner-occupiers, tenants, asset managers, valuers, financiers, governments and the community. However, a lack of understanding or information available to these various stakeholders regarding the economic benefits of green buildings may act as an obstacle to achieving this. This paper investigates whether there is currently sufficient, reliable information available to industry participants in Australia to make informed decisions regarding green buildings and sustainable development. Methodology: This involves surveying various industry participants across Australia in order to understand their current knowledge of and views on the economic benefits and costs of green buildings and comparing these responses with the empirical evidence gathered to date in Australia and around the world. Based on this survey of industry participants, the research reveals a perception or knowledge ‘gap’ regarding the business case for green buildings, potentially restricting the progress of sustainable development in Australia. This survey concentrates on commercial office buildings only, as most empirical research conducted to date on green buildings has been focused here.The empirical sample represents the views of many managers and other stakeholders of major institutional investments who are often not accessible to academic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynne Armitage & Lyndon Tam & James Cox, 2016. "Is there a business case for green office buildings?: Perspectives of institutional stakeholders in Australia," ERES eres2016_52, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2016-52
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.