IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2016_287.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Urban planning and low-carbon cities: a comparison of german and chinese initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Rogerio Santovtio
  • Sven Bienert
  • Alex K. Abiko

Abstract

The world is becoming more urbanized. The estimates made by the UnitedNations (UN, 2014) shows a trend of migration from rural to urban areas:As of 2014, 52% of the global population lives in urban areas, and thispercentage is likely to increase up to 66.4%, with an expectation that theglobal population reaches 9.55 billion until 2050. This urbanization trend isrelevant, since most GHG emissions that contribute to global climate changecome from urban areas. Urban areas are associated with around 70% ofglobal energy consumption and energy-related greenhouse gas emissions.China and Germany are two key players into mitigating the effect of climatechange, and both countries have already managed to implement severalinitiatives towards the development of a low-carbon city. This paper presentthe results of a research whose objective was to compare cities in China(Tianjin, Hangzhou and Beijing) and Germany (Munich and Berlin), andfocuses on the role that urban policymaking plays on getting towardscarbon neutral targets. Results indicate that, despite clear demographicsand economic differences, there are several best practices in the field ofurban planning that can be shared and transferred to cities in bothcountries, helping them to achieve their respective GHG reductions goals.The world is becoming more urbanized. The estimates made by the UnitedNations (UN, 2014) shows a trend of migration from rural to urban areas:As of 2014, 52% of the global population lives in urban areas, and thispercentage is likely to increase up to 66.4%, with an expectation that theglobal population reaches 9.55 billion until 2050. This urbanization trend isrelevant, since most GHG emissions that contribute to global climate changecome from urban areas. Urban areas are associated with around 70% ofglobal energy consumption and energy-related greenhouse gas emissions.China and Germany are two key players into mitigating the effect of climatechange, and both countries have already managed to implement severalinitiatives towards the development of a low-carbon city. This paper presentthe results of a research whose objective was to compare cities in China(Tianjin, Hangzhou and Beijing) and Germany (Munich and Berlin), andfocuses on the role that urban policymaking plays on getting towardscarbon neutral targets. Results indicate that, despite clear demographicsand economic differences, there are several best practices in the field ofurban planning that can be shared and transferred to cities in bothcountries, helping them to achieve their respective GHG reductions goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogerio Santovtio & Sven Bienert & Alex K. Abiko, 2016. "Urban planning and low-carbon cities: a comparison of german and chinese initiatives," ERES eres2016_287, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2016-287
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.