IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2014_117.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Preference-based Accommodation Strategy - A pilot study in scheduling and planning at the Delft University of Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Bart Valks
  • Monique H. Arkesteijn
  • Ruud Binnekamp
  • Peter Barendse
  • Hans de Jonge

Abstract

One of the long-standing issues in the field of corporate real estate management is the alignment of an organisation’s real estate to its corporate strategy. Despite extensive research, existing approaches have not had much uptake in practice and fall short in a number of aspects (H 2011). In 1995, Dutch universities became owners of their real estate, and since then they are confronted with the same issue of alignment. Investments in real estate need to be weighed against investments in education or research programs, making campus management more challenging with more stakeholders, opportunities and threats to consider. Furthermore, this allocation of resources is put under pressure because of decreasing public involvement and funding for Dutch universities. As a result, campus managers have indicated that they need better information and tools to support campus decision making. (DH 2011)To enhance real estate decision making we tested the Preference-based Portfolio Design methodology (PBPD) (A&B 2012) in a gaming context. In this methodology decision makers define criteria and iteratively test and adjust these criteria by designing new real estate portfolios. The new portfolio with the highest overall preference is suggested as the portfolio which optimally aligns real estate to corporate strategy. This process is termed ‘Preference-based Accommodation Strategy’ (PAS). PAS is tested at the Delft University of Technology (DUT) for its real estate portfolio of lecture halls. New portfolio design are made based on 1) stakeholder preferences, in order to optimally align real estate to corporate strategy; and 2) the feasibility of the university’s timetable, in order to ensure that the portfolio design is able to accommodate the university’s programs. The decision makers could not only choose from real estate interventions but also from organizational interventions, which change the scheduling process. The tests done at the DUT prove that the participants are able to use the PBPD methodology to define criteria and that they are able to design portfolios with a higher overall preference. The results suggest that PAS can be used as a tool to align real estate to corporate strategy and to support campus decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Bart Valks & Monique H. Arkesteijn & Ruud Binnekamp & Peter Barendse & Hans de Jonge, 2014. "Preference-based Accommodation Strategy - A pilot study in scheduling and planning at the Delft University of Technology," ERES eres2014_117, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2014_117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2014-117
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/eres2014_117.content.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2014_117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.