IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2012_246.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The German way of valuing property: Investigating the difference between discounted cash flow and the German income approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Reinert

Abstract

The German property market differs from most of its international counterparts in its comparatively low but remarkably stable performance over the past decades. One of the possible reasons for this anomaly could be the German appraisal method referred to as the German Income Approach (Ertragswertverfahren) which is often said to result in an even smoother pattern than the internationally applied Discounted Cash Flow technique. Due to an increasing number of German investors using DCF it was possible to assemble a dataset of almost 3,000 individual German office & retail properties from 2005 to 2010 with a sufficiently large proportion of DCF valuations to allow for a meaningful comparison within the same market. In order to establish whether and to what extent GIA valuations differ from DCF valuations two separate hedonic indices are derived. A novelty of the paper is the integration of valuation and transaction data. Market data is used to derive transaction prices for every property over the time period under investigation. This theoretical transaction price is used to approximate the average margin of error for each appraisal technique. The Heckman two-step procedure (Heckman, 1979) is employed in order to correct for possible sample selection bias. The objective of this paper is to offer more insight into the question which appraisal method more accurately predicts transaction prices on the German property market. A preliminary analysis indicates that there are significant differences between valuations following DCF and GIA.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Reinert, 2012. "The German way of valuing property: Investigating the difference between discounted cash flow and the German income approach," ERES eres2012_246, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2012-246
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.