IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2012_158.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Alternative ways to manage projects - Benchmarking study for housing business management

Author

Listed:
  • Antti Arpiainen

Abstract

The motivation for this research arises from the need of finding new ways of doing business and gaining competitive advantage in housing business management. Housing business is seen as an engineering-led field and investments in research and development are rare, when it comes to develop new methods of working. Moreover, the approach to project management has been very traditional and technology-centered. For example, instead of concentrating on improving the projects creating value to customers, the main focus has been on cheapest price. The objective of this research is to identify best practices of project management, especially in software business, and draw their implications for housing business. The main purpose is to analyze how project management could be improved and enhanced, for example, using software companiesí project management methods. Also, the study discusses how to change already existing approach to project management and how the effectiveness of alternative approaches could be analyzed. In sum, the study is about thinking differently by adopting new ways to manage projects and adding them to housing operatorsí toolbox of project management. In addition to benchmarking, the study contains also interviews of housing operators and home buyers. The data of this study is gathered in Finland and it focuses on Finnish housing market. The focus is on finding alternative approaches to project management in housing business management, but the results are expected to be applicable also to other business fields. The hypothesis is that results indicate the effectiveness of alternative project management approaches in housing business management. The implementation of these best practices makes housing operators more proactive and customer-oriented, which can lead to new competitive advantages and speed up business development. Still, there are few housing operators which are ready to change their existing approach to project management. Therefore, the aim of findings is also encourage housing operators to develop project management methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Antti Arpiainen, 2012. "Alternative ways to manage projects - Benchmarking study for housing business management," ERES eres2012_158, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2012-158
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/eres2012_158.content.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.