IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2010_328.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

International Comparison Of Sustainable Rating Tools-Updated Version 2010

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Bilos
  • Richard Reed
  • Karl-Werner Schulte

Abstract

In recent times there have been a rapidly increasing number of sustainable buildings entering the global real estate market. Many of these buildings differ considerably with respect to their sustainable features from a design and/or performance basis, although a wide range of sustainable building assessment tools are now promoted and readily available throughout the world. Unfortunately many of these tools differ considerably with regards to what they actually assess, how they operate and whether they can be compared directly with assessment tools from other countries. Some global rating tools require a complex series of analytical steps whilst others are conducted on-line via a questionnaire approach and are also substantially less expensive. This paper is based on the last year paper ìInternational Comparison of Global Sustainability Toolsî and examines their characteristics and differences. As the previous paper showed the market for rating tools is worldwide growing. Most importantly the focus is placed on which tools from different countries can be directly compared with each other i.e. is a five star building with one rating system directly comparable with a four star rating another rating system? And a second focus should have a look on the trends in this market i.e. which rating system is the most popular or which tool is the cheapest one? The results of this paper are designed to lessen some of the confusion that accompanies assessment tools for sustainable buildings, which in turn will assist investors, developers, tenants and government bodies to make informed decisions about green buildings. In addition it is envisaged that removing some of the uncertainty associated with sustainable buildings will increase the transparency for stakeholders and assist them to embrace sustainable buildings with more confidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Bilos & Richard Reed & Karl-Werner Schulte, 2010. "International Comparison Of Sustainable Rating Tools-Updated Version 2010," ERES eres2010_328, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2010-328
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.