IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2010_215.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A New Mixed Strategy Framework (Msf) For Investment Performance Evaluation: Empirical Evidence From The Tehran Stock Exchange (Tes)

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Asghar Anv Rostami
  • Farideh Bakhshitakanlou

Abstract

Astronomical amounts of funds invested in financial markets. Consequently, the evaluation of investment performance has created a great deal of interest among practitioners as well as academic researchers. Literature provides various evaluation methods. Since each method has its own weaknesses and strengths and may provide different rankings, it is very important for investors to know which method of evaluation is the best and which investments outperform the others in a given market.The objective of this paper is to provide results of an empirical investigation in the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). In order to select the best investmentsí performance evaluation method, we applied correlation test. To remove the paradox in results of different evaluation methods, a mixed method was introduced. Since the results confirm existing significant differences among the results provided by different performance evaluation methods. We applied the proposed mixed strategy in the TSE. The authors believe that the suggested strategy can help investors in their selection where they face to several and different performance rankings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Asghar Anv Rostami & Farideh Bakhshitakanlou, 2010. "A New Mixed Strategy Framework (Msf) For Investment Performance Evaluation: Empirical Evidence From The Tehran Stock Exchange (Tes)," ERES eres2010_215, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2010-215
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/eres2010_215.content.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2010_215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.