IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2008_126.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unconventional Conventional Wisdom: Rethinking Development Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • N. Crosby
  • J. Henneberry

Abstract

There are a number of convetional techniques that are used to appraise real estate development opportunities. Probably the major advance in development appraisal over the last two decades has been the widespread adoption in the academic literature of (discounted) cash flow techniques instead of the traditional residual approach. All development-focussed textbooks outline and illustrate these conventional techniques reinforcing their use in practice and in development appraisal software. However, conventional approaches to the application of discounted cash flow techniques are not applied in a manner that is consistent with mainstream capital budgeting theory (see Geltner, Eichholtz, Clayton and Miller, 2007; Brown and Matysiak, 1999). It is revealing that the real estate academics that have identified this issue specialise in real estate finance and investment rather than real estate development. In this paper, we discuss the flaws in conventional DC F applications to development appraisal and suggest an alternative that is more consistent with mainstream capital budgeting theory. We also consider some of the challenges that arise in the practical application of such an approach. References Brown, G and Matysiak, G. (1999) Real Estate Investment: A Capital Market Approach, Prentice Hall, London. Geltner, D. Eichholtz, P. Clayton, J and Miller, N. (2007) Commercial Real Estate Analysis and Investments, Thomson South-Western.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Crosby & J. Henneberry, 2008. "Unconventional Conventional Wisdom: Rethinking Development Appraisal," ERES eres2008_126, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2008_126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2008-126
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2008_126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.