IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2007_334.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perceptions of Land and Conflicts: The Case of Nairobi

Author

Listed:
  • Luke Obala

Abstract

Perceptions towards land are as diverse as communities and are shaped by a myriad of factors. Thus in ancient Rome and Australia land was viewed as part of a people, and in some places ancestors were seen as part of both the living and land (Povinelli; 2002). In some communities it was as owning, while in others it may be a person with a soul (De Coppet, 1995). Inspite of the diversity in perceptions of land, there is a consensus that conflicts over land were more intense and continues to be in communities with strong beliefs and perceptions around land. In many communities where there is a difference in perception towards land a conflict always emerges. The story of Nabothís vineyard in the book of Kings clearly illustrates just how influential perceptions towards land are in shaping mansí decisions. Land remains a major source of economic and political power in many countries. This is because it is a source of economic power with profound impact on the psyche of man. In addition, increasing population, failure of the existing institutional and legal frameworks put it in a very special position. As a result the increase in land conflicts in land conflicts exacerbates inequity further weakening the African State. It is also clear that limited studies are taking place, particularly aimed at deepening our understanding of the interaction between land conflicts and inequity. In addition, there is a lack of consensus on appropriate theoretical and methodological tools for explaining the land question. Yet it is evident to all that land ownership, access, and use are acquiring political and ethnic dimensions with potentials for serious political instability across the continent. This paper aims at explaining the relationship between urban land conflicts and inequity. It will further explain how ethnicity interplays with political patronage and corruption within the existing land management systems to perpetuate land conflicts and inequity. It will use several theoretical strands among them institutional analysis to unravel the dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke Obala, 2007. "Perceptions of Land and Conflicts: The Case of Nairobi," ERES eres2007_334, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2007_334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2007-334
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2007_334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.