IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2007_127.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Investors Actually Gain from a Lower Auction Price for Foreclosed Properties

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu-Chin Lin
  • Guang-Jiunn Ko

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that the auction price of foreclosed properties is significantly lower than that if sold in a normal market. A recent study on Taipei real estate market suggests a figure of 17.2% to 20% for this price difference. Other studies also repeatedly point out the very high proportion of investors in bidding for the foreclosed properties. The two phenomena put together raise an ignored but we believe an interesting question- does the lower auction price provide investors an opportunity to earn a higher profit than investing in the normal properties? Most attention has been paid to the price difference at the time when properties are auctioned, but little attention to its consequences after auction. Investors will after all sell those auctioned properties later in a normal market. Datasets of property sales both in auction and normal markets are utilized. Properties that were auctioned and later sold in the normal market are identified, along with properties that were sold twice in the normal market during the record period. In view of the investment nature of foreclosed properties, the redecoration costs and relevant legal expenses before resale are considered. We find that the rate of return in investing between foreclosed and normal properties is different but only marginally, at around 2.5%. This result seems to be in conflict with the widespread view that investment on foreclosed properties often commands a substantial higher profit due to their lower price.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu-Chin Lin & Guang-Jiunn Ko, 2007. "Do Investors Actually Gain from a Lower Auction Price for Foreclosed Properties," ERES eres2007_127, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2007_127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2007-127
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2007_127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.