IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2006_244.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Unbalanced Office Market

Author

Listed:
  • Philip W. Koppels
  • Jo P. Soeter

Abstract

Since 2001 the Dutch office market is dominated by oversupply. The huge office construction output could not be absorbed by the space market. This led to a high vacancy of newly constructed offices and a dramatic decline of further office construction. At the demand side office employment and the amount of square meters per full time equivalent office user are declining. Since 2003 the demand for expansion of the office stock is less than zero. All market absorption of newly constructed offices is used for replacement. Vacancy is gradually shifting from the first hand to the second hand office stock. The vacancy of existing offices is about 12% of total stock and another 3% is vacancy of newly constructed offices. The asset market did not react on the worsened market with higher target yields. They seem to compensate vacancy and rental risks with low real cost of ownership due to low real interest. The relation chain from space market to asset market and to construction market ultimately leads to an unbalance of supply and demand of stock. The oversupply of offices is an advantage for users, but from social, environmental and owners/investors point of view the financial and social loss is a growing problem. From Dutch point of view modelling the office market has to be refined for price inelasticity of space demand, non-rational target yields, weak influence of construction market conditions and segmentation of the office stock.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip W. Koppels & Jo P. Soeter, 2006. "The Unbalanced Office Market," ERES eres2006_244, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2006_244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2006-244
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2006_244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.