IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2006_242.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Paradoxes Of Small Public Private Partnerships: Another Economy, A Life In A Cradle Or Voluntary Innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Koch
  • Jesper Ole Jensen

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that transaction costs linked to the establishment of Public Private Partnerships, make it prohibitive to make them too small. In a Danish context this has been safeguarded by the authorities, which recommend sizes over 13, 4 million euro (100 million euro). The research behind this paper sets out the challenge this size limit. The paper present quantitative and qualitative material on small PPP on the Italian and British real estate market. It is shown that small PPP (below 13,4 million euro) are widespread in the two investigated countries. It is thus not through databases containing data on realized PPP-s possible to find any lower limit for these established PPPs. This apparent paradox is then qualitatively investigated. Are these small PPP really full blown PPP? It is investigated whether the PPP are really Design, Build, Finance and Operate project and to what extent these small projects are sound businesses and represent operable units for the clients and citizens. Cases are developed within education and healthcare. The analysis suggests that another type of economy apparently is in play. It is thus characteristic within education projects in UK that the largest portion of small PPPs are of a size below 5,4 million roughly reflecting the lower limit of obligatory tendering according to EU-law. Among these there are indeed a good portion of ìrealî PPPs. It appears that local public units endeavour in PPPs because they are attracted by the innovation and the companies partnering with the public side seem for a large part to be willing to see the small projects as an element of a learning process, where special conditions can be defended in order to develop competences (the thesis of the cradle- the special protection PPP). Neither Italy nor UK have sufficiently profound and longitudinal examples to rule out this thesis of ìcradle- conditionsî. In the paper these results is discussed vis a vis the development of the European public sector. It is potentially very important for local small units in the public services if small PPP are feasible. It is thus promising for democracy and participation of citizens for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Koch & Jesper Ole Jensen, 2006. "The Paradoxes Of Small Public Private Partnerships: Another Economy, A Life In A Cradle Or Voluntary Innovation?," ERES eres2006_242, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2006_242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2006-242
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2006_242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.