IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2005_343.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi- or Single Tenant Preferences on the Dutch Office Market? The Case AZL

Author

Listed:
  • Robbert van Baal Jan
  • Jos Janssen

Abstract

In this paper we will discuss the differences between multi- and single tenant preferences on the Dutch office market. The aim of this paper is to offer practical tools for developers and investors. We will focus on risk/ return profiles from the perspective of Dutch investors. With a case study on the Dutch office fund of AZL (73 assets and 230 tenants) and the ROZ/IPD benchmark enough data is available to make good portfolio analyses. Attention also will be made on the demand preferences. These preferences will be confronted with the fund portfolio. The results will be presented. The paper will conclude with remarks on a strategic, tactical and operational level.

Suggested Citation

  • Robbert van Baal Jan & Jos Janssen, 2005. "Multi- or Single Tenant Preferences on the Dutch Office Market? The Case AZL," ERES eres2005_343, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2005_343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2005-343
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2005_343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.