IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2310.08284.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Statistical arbitrage portfolio construction based on preference relations

Author

Listed:
  • Fredi v{S}ari'c
  • Stjepan Beguv{s}i'c
  • Andro Mer'cep
  • Zvonko Kostanjv{c}ar

Abstract

Statistical arbitrage methods identify mispricings in securities with the goal of building portfolios which are weakly correlated with the market. In pairs trading, an arbitrage opportunity is identified by observing relative price movements between a pair of two securities. By simultaneously observing multiple pairs, one can exploit different arbitrage opportunities and increase the performance of such methods. However, the use of a large number of pairs is difficult due to the increased probability of contradictory trade signals among different pairs. In this paper, we propose a novel portfolio construction method based on preference relation graphs, which can reconcile contradictory pairs trading signals across multiple security pairs. The proposed approach enables joint exploitation of arbitrage opportunities among a large number of securities. Experimental results using three decades of historical returns of roughly 500 stocks from the S\&P 500 index show that the portfolios based on preference relations exhibit robust returns even with high transaction costs, and that their performance improves with the number of securities considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Fredi v{S}ari'c & Stjepan Beguv{s}i'c & Andro Mer'cep & Zvonko Kostanjv{c}ar, 2023. "Statistical arbitrage portfolio construction based on preference relations," Papers 2310.08284, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.08284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.08284
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2310.08284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.