IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2301.05157.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Statistical Learning with Sublinear Regret of Propagator Models

Author

Listed:
  • Eyal Neuman
  • Yufei Zhang

Abstract

We consider a class of learning problems in which an agent liquidates a risky asset while creating both transient price impact driven by an unknown convolution propagator and linear temporary price impact with an unknown parameter. We characterize the trader's performance as maximization of a revenue-risk functional, where the trader also exploits available information on a price predicting signal. We present a trading algorithm that alternates between exploration and exploitation phases and achieves sublinear regrets with high probability. For the exploration phase we propose a novel approach for non-parametric estimation of the price impact kernel by observing only the visible price process and derive sharp bounds on the convergence rate, which are characterised by the singularity of the propagator. These kernel estimation methods extend existing methods from the area of Tikhonov regularisation for inverse problems and are of independent interest. The bound on the regret in the exploitation phase is obtained by deriving stability results for the optimizer and value function of the associated class of infinite-dimensional stochastic control problems. As a complementary result we propose a regression-based algorithm to estimate the conditional expectation of non-Markovian signals and derive its convergence rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Eyal Neuman & Yufei Zhang, 2023. "Statistical Learning with Sublinear Regret of Propagator Models," Papers 2301.05157, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2301.05157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.05157
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles-Albert Lehalle & Sophie Laruelle (ed.), 2013. "Market Microstructure in Practice," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 8967.
    2. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Yuval Gefen & Marc Potters & Matthieu Wyart, 2004. "Fluctuations and response in financial markets: the subtle nature of 'random' price changes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 176-190.
    3. Ying Chen & Ulrich Horst & Hoang Hai Tran, 2019. "Portfolio liquidation under transient price impact -- theoretical solution and implementation with 100 NASDAQ stocks," Papers 1912.06426, arXiv.org.
    4. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Eyal Neuman, 2022. "Optimal Liquidation with Signals: the General Propagator Case," Working Papers hal-03835948, HAL.
    5. Michele Vodret & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Bence Tóth & Michael Benzaquen, 2022. "Do fundamentals shape the price response? A critical assessment of linear impact models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(12), pages 2139-2150, December.
    6. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Eyal Neuman, 2022. "Optimal Liquidation with Signals: the General Propagator Case," Papers 2211.00447, arXiv.org.
    7. Obizhaeva, Anna A. & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-32.
    8. Charles-Albert Lehalle & Eyal Neuman, 2019. "Incorporating signals into optimal trading," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 275-311, April.
    9. Alexander Lipton & Umberto Pesavento & Michael G Sotiropoulos, 2013. "Trade arrival dynamics and quote imbalance in a limit order book," Papers 1312.0514, arXiv.org.
    10. Rama Cont & Arseniy Kukanov & Sasha Stoikov, 2014. "The Price Impact of Order Book Events," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 47-88.
    11. Jim Gatheral, 2010. "No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(7), pages 749-759.
    12. Eyal Neuman & Alexander Schied, 2016. "Optimal portfolio liquidation in target zone models and catalytic superprocesses," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 495-509, April.
    13. Michele Vodret & Bence Tóth & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Michael Benzaquen, 2022. "Do fundamentals shape the price response? A critical assessment of linear impact models," Post-Print hal-03797375, HAL.
    14. Martin Forde & Leandro Sánchez-Betancourt & Benjamin Smith, 2022. "Optimal trade execution for Gaussian signals with power-law resilience," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 585-596, March.
    15. Eyal Neuman & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2020. "Optimal Signal-Adaptive Trading with Temporary and Transient Price Impact," Papers 2002.09549, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcel Nutz & Kevin Webster & Long Zhao, 2023. "Unwinding Stochastic Order Flow: When to Warehouse Trades," Papers 2310.14144, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Eyal Neuman, 2022. "Optimal Liquidation with Signals: the General Propagator Case," Working Papers hal-03835948, HAL.
    2. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Eyal Neuman, 2022. "Optimal Liquidation with Signals: the General Propagator Case," Papers 2211.00447, arXiv.org.
    3. Marcel Nutz & Kevin Webster & Long Zhao, 2023. "Unwinding Stochastic Order Flow: When to Warehouse Trades," Papers 2310.14144, arXiv.org.
    4. Charles-Albert Lehalle & Eyal Neuman, 2019. "Incorporating signals into optimal trading," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 275-311, April.
    5. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    6. Eyal Neuman & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2020. "Optimal Signal-Adaptive Trading with Temporary and Transient Price Impact," Papers 2002.09549, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    7. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Pierre Blanc, 2015. "Extension and calibration of a Hawkes-based optimal execution model," Papers 1506.08740, arXiv.org.
    8. Natascha Hey & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Kevin Webster, 2023. "The Cost of Misspecifying Price Impact," Papers 2306.00599, arXiv.org.
    9. Philippe Bergault & Fayc{c}al Drissi & Olivier Gu'eant, 2021. "Multi-asset optimal execution and statistical arbitrage strategies under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck dynamics," Papers 2103.13773, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    10. Dupret, Jean-Loup & Hainaut, Donatien, 2023. "Optimal liquidation under indirect price impact with propagator," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023012, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    11. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Eyal Neuman & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2023. "Equilibrium in Functional Stochastic Games with Mean-Field Interaction," Papers 2306.05433, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    12. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Eyal Neuman & Moritz Voss, 2023. "Equilibrium in Functional Stochastic Games with Mean-Field Interaction," Working Papers hal-04119787, HAL.
    13. Kyle Bechler & Michael Ludkovski, 2017. "Order Flows and Limit Order Book Resiliency on the Meso-Scale," Papers 1708.02715, arXiv.org.
    14. Martin D. Gould & Mason A. Porter & Stacy Williams & Mark McDonald & Daniel J. Fenn & Sam D. Howison, 2010. "Limit Order Books," Papers 1012.0349, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2013.
    15. Tao Chen & Mike Ludkovski & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2022. "On Parametric Optimal Execution and Machine Learning Surrogates," Papers 2204.08581, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    16. Alexander Barzykin & Fabrizio Lillo, 2019. "Optimal VWAP execution under transient price impact," Papers 1901.02327, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.
    17. Damiano Brigo & Federico Graceffa & Eyal Neuman, 2022. "Price impact on term structure," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 171-195, January.
    18. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Pierre Blanc, 2014. "Dynamic optimal execution in a mixed-market-impact Hawkes price model," Papers 1404.0648, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    19. Alexander Schied & Tao Zhang, 2019. "A Market Impact Game Under Transient Price Impact," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 102-121, February.
    20. Masamitsu Ohnishi & Makoto Shimoshimizu, 2022. "Optimal Pair–Trade Execution with Generalized Cross–Impact," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 29(2), pages 253-289, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2301.05157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.