IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2210.15499.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Post trade allocation: how much are bunched orders costing your performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Hirsa
  • Massoud Heidari

Abstract

Individual trade orders are often bunched into a block order for processing efficiency, where in post execution, they are allocated into individual accounts. Since Regulators have not mandated any specific post trade allocation practice or methodology, entities try to rigorously follow internal policies and procedures to meet the minimum Regulatory ask of being procedurally fair and equitable. However, as many have found over the years, there is no simple solution for post trade allocation between accounts that results in a uniform distribution of returns. Furthermore, in many instances, the divergences between returns do not dissipate with more transactions, and tend to increase in some cases. This paper is the first systematic treatment of trade allocation risk. We shed light on the reasons for return divergence among accounts, and we present a solution that supports uniform allocation of return irrespective of number of accounts and trade sizes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Hirsa & Massoud Heidari, 2022. "Post trade allocation: how much are bunched orders costing your performance?," Papers 2210.15499, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2210.15499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.15499
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2210.15499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.