IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2108.02633.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The impact of model risk on dynamic portfolio selection under multi-period mean-standard-deviation criterion

Author

Listed:
  • Spiridon Penev
  • Pavel V. Shevchenko
  • Wei Wu

Abstract

We quantify model risk of a financial portfolio whereby a multi-period mean-standard-deviation criterion is used as a selection criterion. In this work, model risk is defined as the loss due to uncertainty of the underlying distribution of the returns of the assets in the portfolio. The uncertainty is measured by the Kullback-Leibler divergence, i.e., the relative entropy. In the worst case scenario, the optimal robust strategy can be obtained in a semi-analytical form as a solution of a system of nonlinear equations. Several numerical results are presented which allow us to compare the performance of this robust strategy with the optimal non-robust strategy. For illustration, we also quantify the model risk associated with an empirical dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Spiridon Penev & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Wei Wu, 2021. "The impact of model risk on dynamic portfolio selection under multi-period mean-standard-deviation criterion," Papers 2108.02633, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2108.02633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.02633
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Glasserman & Xingbo Xu, 2013. "Robust Portfolio Control with Stochastic Factor Dynamics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 874-893, August.
    2. Duan Li & Wan‐Lung Ng, 2000. "Optimal Dynamic Portfolio Selection: Multiperiod Mean‐Variance Formulation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), pages 387-406, July.
    3. Gregory Connor & Lisa R. Goldberg & Robert A. Korajczyk, 2010. "Portfolio Risk Analysis," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9224.
    4. Kapsos, Michalis & Christofides, Nicos & Rustem, Berç, 2014. "Worst-case robust Omega ratio," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 499-507.
    5. Arellano-Valle, Reinaldo B. & Genton, Marc G., 2005. "On fundamental skew distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 93-116, September.
    6. Yuhong Xu, 2014. "Robust valuation and risk measurement under model uncertainty," Papers 1407.8024, arXiv.org.
    7. Chen, Zhi-ping & Li, Gang & Guo, Ju-e, 2013. "Optimal investment policy in the time consistent mean–variance formulation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 145-156.
    8. Landsman, Zinoviy & Makov, Udi, 2012. "Translation-invariant and positive-homogeneous risk measures and optimal portfolio management in the presence of a riskless component," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 94-98.
    9. Jiang, Chonghui & Ma, Yongkai & An, Yunbi, 2010. "An analysis of portfolio selection with background risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 3055-3060, December.
    10. Kang Boda & Jerzy Filar, 2006. "Time Consistent Dynamic Risk Measures," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 63(1), pages 169-186, February.
    11. Kim, Woo Chang & Kim, Min Jeong & Kim, Jang Ho & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2014. "Robust portfolios that do not tilt factor exposure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 411-421.
    12. Schneider, Judith C. & Schweizer, Nikolaus, 2015. "Robust measurement of (heavy-tailed) risks: Theory and implementation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 183-203.
    13. Henry Lam, 2016. "Robust Sensitivity Analysis for Stochastic Systems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 1248-1275, November.
    14. Thomas Breuer & Imre Csiszár, 2016. "Measuring Distribution Model Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 395-411, April.
    15. Paul Glasserman & Xingbo Xu, 2014. "Robust risk measurement and model risk," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 29-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Penev, Spiridon & Shevchenko, Pavel V. & Wu, Wei, 2019. "The impact of model risk on dynamic portfolio selection under multi-period mean-standard-deviation criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 772-784.
    2. Thomas Kruse & Judith C. Schneider & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2021. "A Toolkit for Robust Risk Assessment Using F -Divergences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6529-6552, October.
    3. Roberto Baviera & Giulia Bianchi, 2019. "Model risk in mean-variance portfolio selection: an analytic solution to the worst-case approach," Papers 1902.06623, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    4. Sebastian Jaimungal & Silvana M. Pesenti & Leandro S'anchez-Betancourt, 2022. "Minimal Kullback-Leibler Divergence for Constrained L\'evy-It\^o Processes," Papers 2206.14844, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    5. Roberto Baviera & Giulia Bianchi, 2021. "Model risk in mean-variance portfolio selection: an analytic solution to the worst-case approach," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 469-491, October.
    6. Henry Lam, 2018. "Sensitivity to Serial Dependency of Input Processes: A Robust Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1311-1327, March.
    7. Thomas Kruse & Judith C. Schneider & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2019. "Technical Note—The Joint Impact of F -Divergences and Reference Models on the Contents of Uncertainty Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 428-435, March.
    8. Aleksandrina Goeva & Henry Lam & Huajie Qian & Bo Zhang, 2019. "Optimization-Based Calibration of Simulation Input Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1362-1382, September.
    9. Yu Feng & Ralph Rudd & Christopher Baker & Qaphela Mashalaba & Melusi Mavuso & Erik Schlögl, 2021. "Quantifying the Model Risk Inherent in the Calibration and Recalibration of Option Pricing Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Chen, Zhiping & Li, Gang & Zhao, Yonggan, 2014. "Time-consistent investment policies in Markovian markets: A case of mean–variance analysis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 293-316.
    11. Kim, Sojung & Weber, Stefan, 2022. "Simulation methods for robust risk assessment and the distorted mix approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 380-398.
    12. Mohammed Berkhouch & Fernanda Maria Müller & Ghizlane Lakhnati & Marcelo Brutti Righi, 2022. "Deviation-Based Model Risk Measures," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 527-547, February.
    13. Jose Blanchet & Karthyek Murthy, 2019. "Quantifying Distributional Model Risk via Optimal Transport," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 565-600, May.
    14. Zhiping Chen & Jia Liu & Gang Li & Zhe Yan, 2016. "Composite time-consistent multi-period risk measure and its application in optimal portfolio selection," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(3), pages 515-540, October.
    15. Carole Bernard & Silvana M. Pesenti & Steven Vanduffel, 2022. "Robust Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2205.08850, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    16. Soumyadip Ghosh & Henry Lam, 2019. "Robust Analysis in Stochastic Simulation: Computation and Performance Guarantees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 232-249, January.
    17. Cohen, Asaf & Saha, Subhamay, 2021. "Asymptotic optimality of the generalized cμ rule under model uncertainty," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 206-236.
    18. Alireza Ghahtarani & Ahmed Saif & Alireza Ghasemi, 2022. "Robust portfolio selection problems: a comprehensive review," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3203-3264, September.
    19. Yu Feng, 2019. "Theory and Application of Model Risk Quantification," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 3-2019.
    20. Henry Lam, 2016. "Robust Sensitivity Analysis for Stochastic Systems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 1248-1275, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2108.02633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.