IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1909.01936.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

State Drug Policy Effectiveness: Comparative Policy Analysis of Drug Overdose Mortality

Author

Listed:
  • Jarrod Olson
  • Po-Hsu Allen Chen
  • Marissa White
  • Nicole Brennan
  • Ning Gong

Abstract

Opioid overdose rates have reached an epidemic level and state-level policy innovations have followed suit in an effort to prevent overdose deaths. State-level drug law is a set of policies that may reinforce or undermine each other, and analysts have a limited set of tools for handling the policy collinearity using statistical methods. This paper uses a machine learning method called hierarchical clustering to empirically generate "policy bundles" by grouping states with similar sets of policies in force at a given time together for analysis in a 50-state, 10-year interrupted time series regression with drug overdose deaths as the dependent variable. Policy clusters were generated from 138 binomial variables observed by state and year from the Prescription Drug Abuse Policy System. Clustering reduced the policies to a set of 10 bundles. The approach allows for ranking of the relative effect of different bundles and is a tool to recommend those most likely to succeed. This study shows that a set of policies balancing Medication Assisted Treatment, Naloxone Access, Good Samaritan Laws, Medication Assisted Treatment, Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and legalization of medical marijuana leads to a reduced number of overdose deaths, but not until its second year in force.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarrod Olson & Po-Hsu Allen Chen & Marissa White & Nicole Brennan & Ning Gong, 2019. "State Drug Policy Effectiveness: Comparative Policy Analysis of Drug Overdose Mortality," Papers 1909.01936, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1909.01936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.01936
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1909.01936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.