IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1809.03442.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Ladder Theory of Behavioral Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Xingguang Chen

Abstract

We study individual decision-making behavioral on generic view. Using a formal mathematical model, we investigate the action mechanism of decision behavioral under subjective perception changing of task attributes. Our model is built on work in two kinds classical behavioral decision making theory: "prospect theory (PT)" and "image theory (IT)". We consider subjective attributes preference of decision maker under the whole decision process. Strategies collection and selection mechanism are induced according the description of multi-attributes decision making. A novel behavioral decision-making framework named "ladder theory (LT)" is proposed. By real four cases comparing, the results shows that the LT have better explanation and prediction ability then PT and IT under some decision situations. Furthermore, we use our model to shed light on that the LT theory can cover PT and IT ideally. It is the enrichment and development for classical behavioral decision theory and, it has positive theoretical value and instructive significance for explaining plenty of real decision-making phenomena. It may facilitate our understanding of how individual decision-making performed actually.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingguang Chen, 2018. "The Ladder Theory of Behavioral Decision Making," Papers 1809.03442, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1809.03442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.03442
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1809.03442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.