IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1705.09955.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Standardised Reputation Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Mitic

Abstract

Well-defined formal definitions for sentiment and opinion are extended to incorporate the necessary elements to provide a formal quantitative definition of reputation. This definition takes the form of a time-based index, in which each element is a function of a collection of opinions mined during a given time period. The resulting formal definition is validated against informal notions of reputation. Practical aspects of data procurement to support such a reputation index are discussed. The assumption that all mined opinions comprise a complete set is questioned. A case is made that unexpressed positive sentiment exists, and can be quantified.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Mitic, 2017. "Standardised Reputation Measurement," Papers 1705.09955, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1705.09955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.09955
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Mitic, 2018. "Noise Reduction in a Reputation Index," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1705.09955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.