IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1305.4013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A market impact game under transient price impact

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Schied
  • Tao Zhang

Abstract

We consider a Nash equilibrium between two high-frequency traders in a simple market impact model with transient price impact and additional quadratic transaction costs. Extending a result by Sch\"oneborn (2008), we prove existence and uniqueness of the Nash equilibrium and show that for small transaction costs the high-frequency traders engage in a "hot-potato game", in which the same asset position is sold back and forth. We then identify a critical value for the size of the transaction costs above which all oscillations disappear and strategies become buy-only or sell-only. Numerical simulations show that for both traders the expected costs can be lower with transaction costs than without. Moreover, the costs can increase with the trading frequency when there are no transaction costs, but decrease with the trading frequency when transaction costs are sufficiently high. We argue that these effects occur due to the need of protection against predatory trading in the regime of low transaction costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Schied & Tao Zhang, 2013. "A market impact game under transient price impact," Papers 1305.4013, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1305.4013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.4013
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfonsi Aurélien & Alexander Schied & Alla Slynko, 2012. "Order Book Resilience, Price Manipulation, and the Positive Portfolio Problem," Post-Print hal-00941333, HAL.
    2. Markus K. Brunnermeier & Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2005. "Predatory Trading," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 60(4), pages 1825-1863, August.
    3. Aurélien Alfonsi & Alexander Schied, 2010. "Optimal trade execution and absence of price manipulations in limit order book models," Post-Print hal-00397652, HAL.
    4. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Antje Fruth & Alexander Schied, 2007. "Optimal execution strategies in limit order books with general shape functions," Papers 0708.1756, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2010.
    5. Aurelien Alfonsi & Antje Fruth & Alexander Schied, 2010. "Optimal execution strategies in limit order books with general shape functions," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 143-157.
    6. Obizhaeva, Anna A. & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-32.
    7. Bruce Ian Carlin & Miguel Sousa Lobo & S. Viswanathan, 2007. "Episodic Liquidity Crises: Cooperative and Predatory Trading," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(5), pages 2235-2274, October.
    8. Jim Gatheral, 2010. "No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(7), pages 749-759.
    9. Fouque,Jean-Pierre & Langsam,Joseph A. (ed.), 2013. "Handbook on Systemic Risk," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107023437.
    10. Bertsimas, Dimitris & Lo, Andrew W., 1998. "Optimal control of execution costs," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 1-50, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masaaki Fujii, 2022. "Equilibrium Pricing of Securities in the Co-Presence of Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Populations," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1201, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    2. Masaaki Fujii, 2023. "Equilibrium pricing of securities in the co-presence of cooperative and non-cooperative populations (Forthcoming in ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations) (Revised version of CARF-F-," CARF F-Series CARF-F-562, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    3. Masaaki Fujii, 2022. "Equilibrium pricing of securities in the co-presence of cooperative and non-cooperative populations," Papers 2209.12639, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    4. Masaaki Fujii, 2022. "Equilibrium Pricing of Securities in the Co-presence of Cooperative and Non-cooperative Populations," CARF F-Series CARF-F-545, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    5. Taiga Saito & Akihiko Takahashi, 2018. "Online Supplement for "Stochastic Differential Game in High Frequency Market"," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1087, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Alexander Schied & Florian Klock, 2013. "Multivariate transient price impact and matrix-valued positive definite functions," Papers 1310.4471, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    2. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    3. Hans Follmer & Alexander Schied, 2013. "Probabilistic aspects of finance," Papers 1309.7759, arXiv.org.
    4. Arne Lokka & Junwei Xu, 2020. "Optimal liquidation trajectories for the Almgren-Chriss model with Levy processes," Papers 2002.03376, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    5. Lokka, A. & Xu, Junwei, 2020. "Optimal liquidation trajectories for the Almgren-Chriss model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106977, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Olivier Guéant & Charles-Albert Lehalle, 2015. "General Intensity Shapes In Optimal Liquidation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 457-495, July.
    7. Christopher Lorenz & Alexander Schied, 2013. "Drift dependence of optimal trade execution strategies under transient price impact," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 743-770, October.
    8. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Pierre Blanc, 2014. "Dynamic optimal execution in a mixed-market-impact Hawkes price model," Papers 1404.0648, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    9. Hyoeun Lee & Kiseop Lee, 2020. "Optimal execution with liquidity risk in a diffusive order book market," Papers 2004.10951, arXiv.org.
    10. Emilio Said, 2022. "Market Impact: Empirical Evidence, Theory and Practice," Working Papers hal-03668669, HAL.
    11. Alexander Schied & Tao Zhang, 2019. "A Market Impact Game Under Transient Price Impact," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 102-121, February.
    12. Xiangge Luo & Alexander Schied, 2018. "Nash equilibrium for risk-averse investors in a market impact game with transient price impact," Papers 1807.03813, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.
    13. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Jos'e Infante Acevedo, 2012. "Optimal execution and price manipulations in time-varying limit order books," Papers 1204.2736, arXiv.org.
    14. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Pierre Blanc, 2015. "Extension and calibration of a Hawkes-based optimal execution model," Papers 1506.08740, arXiv.org.
    15. Dirk Becherer & Todor Bilarev & Peter Frentrup, 2015. "Optimal Asset Liquidation with Multiplicative Transient Price Impact," Papers 1501.01892, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2017.
    16. Aurélien Alfonsi & Florian Klöck & Alexander Schied, 2016. "Multivariate Transient Price Impact and Matrix-Valued Positive Definite Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 914-934, August.
    17. Qinghua Li, 2014. "Facilitation and Internalization Optimal Strategy in a Multilateral Trading Context," Papers 1404.7320, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    18. Taiga Saito, 2017. "Hedging and pricing illiquid options with market impacts," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(02n03), pages 1-37, June.
    19. Nico Achtsis & Dirk Nuyens, 2013. "A Monte Carlo method for optimal portfolio executions," Papers 1312.5919, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1305.4013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.