IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/apl/wpaper/20-08.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Winning an NCAA Basketball Championship on Applications, Enrollment, and Academic Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Austin F. Eggers
  • Peter A. Groothuis

Abstract

Objective: We analyze how winning a national championship in men’s basketball influences both the quantity and academic quality of students attending the university. Methods: We use a fixed effect regression technique on a fourteen-year panel data set of universities to analyze the influence of winning a men’s basketball national championship on a university’s admissions and academic profile. Using this technique, we examine if student applications, admissions rate, academic yield or academic quality changes at the victorious institution. Results: Our findings suggest that winning a national championship has no effect on applications nor the admissions rate at a school, but does increase the enrollment yield for both male and female students. We also find that there is a slight increase in the quality of students who enroll as measured by academic test scores and high school rank. Conclusion: Our results indicate that winning an NCAA men’s basketball national championship does not serve to increase the number of applications or admissions rate to a school. The relatively minor increases in student quality and enrollment outlined in this study seem to contradict the idea that a successful men’s basketball program, as measured by winning a national championship, could be used as a marketing tool by a university to enhance its academic profile. Key Words:

Suggested Citation

  • Austin F. Eggers & Peter A. Groothuis, 2020. "The Impact of Winning an NCAA Basketball Championship on Applications, Enrollment, and Academic Quality," Working Papers 20-08, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:apl:wpaper:20-08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econ.appstate.edu/RePEc/pdf/wp2008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apl:wpaper:20-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: O. Ashton Morgan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deappus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.