IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aon/report/2017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment of the prospective fiscal stance appropiate for the euro area

Author

Listed:
  • European Fiscal Board (EFB)

Abstract

The report is an assessment of the prospective fiscal stance appropriate for the euro area as a whole. The timing of the publication reflects the sequencing of policy decisions in the annual surveillance cycle of the European Semester: advice on fiscal policy for 2018 has to be offered before Member States start preparing their budgets. The EFB will publish its first Annual Report in the autumn focusing on how the framework for national fiscal policies - the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact – has been applied and how it might be reformed. The EFB's assessment highlights that although economic slack in the euro area as a whole is expected to recede in 2018 the recovery remains comparatively slow and scarred by the impact of the exceptionally deep post-2007 crises. Taking into account available evidence about the economic situation and outlook as well as public finances in the euro area Member States, the EFB concludes that in 2018 there is neither a case for a discretionary fiscal impulse nor for a fiscal contraction. A neutral fiscal stance is considered to be appropriate combined with a re-composition of government expenditure towards higher investment spending. Government investment is the expenditure category which in per cent of GDP suffered particularly large cuts during the last phase of fiscal consolidations. The EFB notes that a neutral fiscal stance for the euro area as a whole could be achieved through differentiated national fiscal policies within the parameters of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP): Countries with fiscal space – in the sense of having done better than their Medium-Term Objective for public finances – make use of it, while consolidation continues in other countries especially those with high government debt-to-GDP ratios. The EFB acknowledges differences between the euro-area and the country-by-country perspective. From a purely national perspective, cyclical conditions in Member States with fiscal space are not necessarily perceived as warranting a fiscal expansion, while a fiscal expansion is taken to be justified in Member States with no fiscal space and where SGP rules require consolidation. Such differences in perspective are bound to arise in the current governance framework which combines centralised monetary policy with decentralised, rules-based fiscal policy. Individual countries do not factor in cross-country effects of national fiscal policy and, more generally, do not plan policies aimed at a smooth functioning of the euro area as a whole. Such tensions can only be overcome through enhanced forms of cross-country coordination or further fiscal integration.

Suggested Citation

  • European Fiscal Board (EFB), 2017. "Assessment of the prospective fiscal stance appropiate for the euro area," Reports 2017, European Fiscal Board.
  • Handle: RePEc:aon:report:2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/prospective_euro_area_fiscal_stance_2017_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sigl-Glöckner, Philippa & Krahé, Max & Kern, Florian & Schuster, Florian, 2022. "Zur Weiterentwicklung der europäischen Fiskalregeln," Papers 277895, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    2. Francesco Spadafora, 2020. "Completing the Economic and Monetary Union: Wisdom Come Late?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 6(3), pages 379-409, November.
    3. P. Butzen & S. Cheliout & N. Cordemans & E. De Prest & W. Melyn & L. Van Meensel & S. Van Parys, 2017. "Towards a new policy mix in the euro area ?," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue iii, pages 63-91, December.
    4. Ad van Riet, 2018. "The European Central Bank as the Only Game in Town: How Could Fiscal Policy Makers Play Along?," Credit and Capital Markets, Credit and Capital Markets, vol. 51(1), pages 93-111.
    5. Sigl-Glöckner, Philippa & Krahé, Max & Kern, Florian & Schuster, Florian, 2022. "A proposal for reforming the Stability and Growth Pact," Papers 277897, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    6. Atanas Pekanov, 2018. "The New View on Fiscal Policy and its Implications for the European Monetary Union," WIFO Working Papers 562, WIFO.
    7. Hughes Hallett, Andrew & Mavrodimitrakis, Christos, 2019. "Cooperation vs. leadership in a core-periphery monetary union: Inter-country vs. inter-institutional policy coordination," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 103-122.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aon:report:2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: European Fiscal Board secretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeube.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.