This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental disclosure: a neo-institutional perspective

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Aerts W.
Cormier D.
Magnan M.
Abstract

Corporate environmental reporting (CER) has been studied from different angles. In this paper we focus on CER from a neo-institutional perspective. CER could indeed be considered as a set of structures and practices that became institutionalised over time. Organizations derive their legitimacy in part from having reporting structures that are seen as appropriate. By incorporating legitimating structural elements (e.g. symbolizing the concept of stakeholder concern) in their reporting behavior, organizations signal conformity with societal concerns and expectations. Neo-institutional theory would predict a tendency towards conformity in implementation as CER became institutionalised over time. Mimetic isomorphism (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983) is one of the processes through which organizations change over time to become more similar to other organizations in their environment. In this paper we study intra-industry imitation as one possible component of the process by which ER decisions are made. Content similarity is the focal construct in this research. Reporting mimetism is studied on the basis of structural content similarity (quantitative versus qualitative/descriptive) and disclosure level similarity of a predefined set of information items in a longitudinal research setting. Similarity indices are constructed according to company reference groups determined on the country / industry / year level. The sample covers a 6 year period and 3 countries with distinct legal and regulatory environments (Canada, Germany and France). Results confirm and document mimetic tendencies. Higher rates of reporting similarity within a reference group predict a tendency to more similarity in the following period. Imitation tendencies are more pronounced on the higher information quality levels (quantitative or monetary information versus descriptive and qualitative information). The imitation relationship is reduced by public media exposure and remains unchallenged by economic variables (coercive forces). These results support an institutional mimetism interpretation of the imitation relationship. Mimetic tendencies are more pronounced in Canada where a significant tradition in CER developed earlier than in Germany and France.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ua.ac.be/download.aspx?c=*TEWHI&n=14362&ct=009828&e=21489
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics in its series Working Papers with number 2003028.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 37 pages
Date of creation: Dec 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2003028

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Prinsstraat 13, B-2000 Antwerpen
Web page: http://www.ua.ac.be/tew
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Joeri Nys).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There are NEP reports in over 80 fields that deliver new research to your email.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-28.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.