IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/amz/wpaper/2021-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Paris-compliant company: Measuring transition performance using a strict science-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Rekker, Saphira
  • Ives, Matthew
  • Wade, Belinda
  • Greig, Chris
  • Webb, Lachlan

Abstract

To meet climate goals, it is necessary for companies to become Paris-compliant. Two recent initiatives, the Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) and Assessing low-Carbon Transitions (ACT) initiative, have proposed methodologies to benchmark companies􏰀 performances against science-based emission reduction levels. However, these initiatives have several limitations, including a shifting baseline, and a focus on carbon-intensities. Here, we propose a methodology that overcomes these limitations by ensuring each company strictly adheres to the Paris carbon budget. Applying our metrics to the ten highest emitting companies in the Australian electricity sector, we find that none are currently Paris-compliant, with every year of delayed action increasing their required rate of decarbonisation and hence the exposure of billions in assets to transition risk. We demonstrate that even using the more prescriptive ACT guidelines allows these companies to exceed their carbon budgets up to 235% by mid-century. Applying our proposed method ensures accurate tracking of progress, which is imperative for companies and stakeholders to align their decision-making with the Paris Agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Rekker, Saphira & Ives, Matthew & Wade, Belinda & Greig, Chris & Webb, Lachlan, 2021. "The Paris-compliant company: Measuring transition performance using a strict science-based approach," INET Oxford Working Papers 2021-03, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, revised Oct 2021.
  • Handle: RePEc:amz:wpaper:2021-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inet.ox.ac.uk/files/RnR_Manuscript_The-Paris-Compliant-Company-ForDistr.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:amz:wpaper:2021-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: INET Oxford admin team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inoxfuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.